Performance Analysis of CBR Applications on Completely Different Routing Protocols in MANETs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18486/ijcsnt/4.2.050Keywords:
MANETs, Routing Protocols, AODV, DSR, DYMO, OLSR, Qualnet, Traffic CBRAbstract
Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) area unit special reasonably network where node movement is in pre ordered fashion but with high speed as compared to MANETs because of high mobility of nodes then it move in random way, right information in mobile networks can be an advanced. So information sending is not easy due to varied requirements of varied applications in terms of various resources like information and current time. The research work gives performance analysis of four forms of routing protocols on CBR applications. The present paper gives performance of packet delivery ratio, packet loss and packet ratio percent for CBR applications in many situation varied pause times and most, minimum speed of nodes. The scenario of several routing protocols shows variation in many conditions. The performance analysis of varied parameter in terms of Quality of service parameters like packet deliver ratio, packet loss and packet loss percent has been studied by varied altogether totally different conditions of CBR traffic that has provides an insight to packet delivery ratio that in turn area unit typically used to enhance performance of an application in future.
References
Vaishali and Katocha K. Simulation based performance evaluation of routing protocols in vehicular ad hoc networks. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 2013; 3(10).
Gandhi S, Chaubey N, Tada N et al. Scenario based performance comparison of reactive, proactive and hybrid protocols in manet. In International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI). India: IEEE, pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCI.2012.6158842
Ismail Z and Hassan R. A performance study of various mobility speed on aodv routing protocol in homogeneous and heterogeneous manet. In Seventeenth Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC). Malaysia: IEEE, pp. 637–642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/APCC.2011.6152886
Tomar GS, Shrivastava L and Bhadauria SS. Load balanced congestion adaptive routing for randomly distributed mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Personal Communications 2014; 75(2): 2723–2733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1663-9
Layuan L and Chunlin L. Performance evaluation and simulations of routing protocols in ad hoc networks. ScienceDirect 2007; : 1890–1898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2007.02.015
Agarwal K and Sejwar V. Effect on throughput due to changes in transmission power of nodes in manets. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking 2015; 8(3): 207–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14257/ijfgcn.2015.8.3.19
Koshti D and Kamoji S. Comparative study of techniques used for detection of selfish nodes in mobile ad hoc networks. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE) 2011; 1(4): 1–6.
Tomar GS, Kim JY, Shrivastava L et al. Load balanced congestion adaptive routing for mobile ad hoc networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 2014; 2014: 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/532043
Shrivastava L, Bhadauria SS and Tomar GS. Influence of traffic load on the performance of aodv, dsr and dsdv in manet. International Journal of Communication Systems and Network Technologies 2013; 1(1): 22–34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shailendra Shakya, Karuna Markam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
